2009 May 25 SEDS-USA Exec Transcript
From SEDSWiki
| SEDS-USA Executive Board Meeting, May 25, 2009 |
|
Time: 8:30 PM EST
|
Transcript
[19:25] rick12500: Do we have a chat room yet?
[19:26] rmmlg08: has joined the chat
[19:26] aggieastronaut: has joined the chat
[19:26] shinigaminote: has joined the chat
[19:26] VonBraunGuy: has joined the chat
[19:26] rick12500: has joined the chat
[19:28] rick12500: Hello all!
[19:28] Wemewaw27: has joined the chat
[19:28] rick12500: Hey, quick if you have a sec, give me feedback on this design: http://seds.org/isss/
[19:29] VonBraunGuy: looks good
[19:29] VonBraunGuy: nice and professional
[19:29] aggieastronaut: I agree with Grant
[19:29] Wemewaw27: I like it, good organization
[19:29] rick12500: Does the right hand stuff show as purple-ish colors for people?
[19:30] rick12500: I'm using a friend's computer and they look purple rather than blue.
[19:30] rmmlg08: I see blue
[19:30] Wemewaw27: they are blue
[19:30] aggieastronaut: blue
[19:30] rick12500: Ok, just a weird monitor.
[19:30] VonBraunGuy: looks blue to me
[19:30] VonBraunGuy: maybe his gamma is weird
[19:30] rick12500: probably
[19:30] rick12500: He's not surprised.
[19:31] rick12500: Anyone else showing up?
[19:31] rmmlg08: I'll give about another minute
[19:31] rick12500: BTW, I'll have a better version of my test wordpress site there soon.
[19:32] rmmlg08: ok, looks like no one else
[19:32] rmmlg08: so...
[19:33] rmmlg08: first up: SV website feedback
[19:33] rmmlg08: have people looked at it
[19:33] rick12500: The site looks good, but I have some thoughts on the reg form.
[19:33] rmmlg08: go ahead
[19:34] rick12500: For the banquet registration, should we have the normal number be 0 until it is changed?
[19:35] shinigaminote: yeah it comes off that you have to participant at first
[19:35] rmmlg08: I'm seeing a 65 if I do studet and banquet
[19:35] rick12500: The other thing may be a possible second e-mail field in case we are sending them confirmation or something. That would make sure we don't get wrong e-mails to send confirmations to.
[19:36] rmmlg08: that's a good idea
[19:36] rmmlg08: (I'll tell josh to just read the minutes (although I'm sure he would anyway)), so we can just throw comments out
[19:37] Wemewaw27: they were talking about late registrations and per-day registration at the planning meetings, but I see nothing on that
[19:37] rick12500: Is there a reason we are setting it up so you can sign up 10 people at once?
[19:37] rmmlg08: so, some people have wanted to do that in the past
[19:37] rmmlg08: I know some chapters wanted to for sv07, so that's a nifty feature
[19:37] rick12500: Ok, it makes sense, just seems to add a bit of complication.
[19:37] Wemewaw27: also, the agenda page is screwed up on my computer
[19:38] Wemewaw27: does anyone else have this problem? all the words run into each other, it's extremely difficult to read
[19:38] rmmlg08: no, looks like a google doc frame
[19:38] rmmlg08: or rrather google calendar frame
[19:38] rmmlg08: what browser/os
[19:38] rick12500: There's not a much better way to make that work.
[19:39] Wemewaw27: ok, saturday was messed up and ran into itself on my comp
[19:39] rmmlg08: other than that, I agree; it looks pretty good; wondering about the sponsorship situation, though
[19:39] shinigaminote: do we have to use google cal?
[19:39] rick12500: Maybe for the agenda, they should set the google calendar on agenda view. That would look better.
[19:39] rmmlg08: eh, maybe
[19:39] rmmlg08: so, there are positives and negatives of using google calendar
[19:40] Wemewaw27: one last comment, I'd like to see the location named first on the location page, then the rest of the information
[19:40] rmmlg08: I think that it's preferable for a static page
[19:40] rick12500: If you want you can do it and look at it that way, it's much cleaner
[19:40] rmmlg08: but google calendar is easier
[19:40] rick12500: Agreed on the location stuff Keri.
[19:40] rmmlg08: makes sense
[19:40] rmmlg08: anything else?
[19:40] rick12500: One other thing on the registration form:
[19:41] rick12500: They need to think about if you are having a group of people registering who want to go to the banquet, you need to be able to pick and choose who is actually a vegitarian.
[19:41] rick12500: Rather than just a check box.
[19:42] rmmlg08: you mean, if they are regging more than one person at a time?
[19:42] rick12500: And maybe put some small print under donation on where that money would be going.
[19:42] rick12500: Yeah, that's what I meant ryan.
[19:42] rick12500: I can see a group doing that and then having issues.
[19:42] rmmlg08: ok, well it sounds like there is a good bit of debugging and thought that needs to be put into this multiple reg thing
[19:42] Wemewaw27: also, on pages with less information then there will be, like sponsors, speakers, and especially exhibitors, it might be nice to have a quick "more information will be available at a later date" or something of the sort,
[19:42] Wemewaw27: though that might just be me being nit-picky
[19:43] rmmlg08: no, that makese sense
[19:43] rmmlg08: other things?
[19:44] rick12500: Maybe info for sponsors on what presence they may get at the site or at the conference depending on sponsorship.
[19:44] rmmlg08: well, that generally takes the form of a sponsorship prospectus
[19:44] rmmlg08: but there should be a place ont eh website for sponsors to contact if they are interested
[19:44] rick12500: Yeah
[19:45] rick12500: Also on the contact page (sorry to nitpick) they need to explain that you need to do with the CAPITCHA.
[19:45] rick12500: It's kinda unclear.
[19:46] rick12500: I meant what (not that) you need to do with the CAPTCHA.
[19:46] rmmlg08: even some better formatting may fix that
[19:47] rick12500: Overall a good looking site!
[19:47] rmmlg08: ie the boxes are kinda floating around (particularly the captcha box)
[19:47] rmmlg08: in any case, anything else?
[19:47] Wemewaw27: nothing more from me
[19:48] rick12500: nope
[19:48] rmmlg08: ok cool: moving on then
[19:48] rmmlg08: so, meeting time for hte summer
[19:48] rmmlg08: mon, tues, thurs (all at 2100 est)
[19:49] rmmlg08: anyone want to propose a day
[19:49] VonBraunGuy: i propose keeping the meeting on monday
[19:49] rick12500: I propose Monday too.
[19:49] Wemewaw27: I agree
[19:49] rmmlg08: cool, so vote
[19:49] aggieastronaut: sounds good to me
[19:49] shinigaminote: monday too
[19:49] rick12500: Just a time change in that case.
[19:49] rmmlg08: all in favor of monday
[19:49] rick12500: aye
[19:49] VonBraunGuy: aye
[19:49] rmmlg08: i
[19:49] shinigaminote: aye
[19:49] aggieastronaut: eye
[19:49] Wemewaw27: aye
[19:50] rmmlg08: ok 6-0-0
[19:50] rmmlg08: so, CoC
[19:50] rmmlg08: 4 months or monthly; Grant, I'll let you take this one
[19:50] VonBraunGuy: i can see the case for doing it either way
[19:51] rick12500: That was 4 times per year, Ryan.
[19:51] VonBraunGuy: oftentimes there's little to discuss at a monthly meeting
[19:51] rick12500: What about bi-monthly?
[19:51] VonBraunGuy: which has probably been hurting attendance
[19:51] VonBraunGuy: but there are also times when we've wanted CoC to make a decision quickly on a matter
[19:51] VonBraunGuy: bi-monthly might be a good compromise
[19:51] Wemewaw27: I'm completely against doing it only 4 times year, or any less than current. There would be more to discuss if they brought up their own issues. THey need to be more involved.
[19:52] Wemewaw27: Limiting the time they talk and taking out responsibility only makes them shirk off that responsibility more.
[19:52] rick12500: I'd like to suggest that bi-monthly would work very well as long as agendas are given a week+ before the meeting.
[19:52] Wemewaw27: Challenge them.
[19:52] rick12500: Yeah, I'd say we should challenge them more to come up with ideas for collaboration or other issues.
[19:52] VonBraunGuy: i get the feeling that there's little interest among the CoC in making change or reform to the national organization
[19:52] rick12500: Otherwise what are we here for anyways?
[19:53] Wemewaw27: I think monthly is already a lot of time inbetween meetings. The people I've talked to don't take it seriously. Challenge them to come up with more items. People always procrastinate.
[19:53] VonBraunGuy: they're perfeclty capable of doing this but don't seem to want to enact any such ideas
[19:53] rick12500: I'm not talking about the national org.
[19:53] Wemewaw27: More time inbetween meetings means more procrastinating, no more work done, maybe less.
[19:53] rick12500: Kinda agree.
[19:53] Wemewaw27: Get them interested Grant! Give them a reason!
[19:53] VonBraunGuy: I agree, I think more time off will lead to more apathy
[19:53] rick12500: I wouldn't make them more frequent though.
[19:54] VonBraunGuy: the key, then, is how to challenge them
[19:54] Wemewaw27: Heck, I'd like to see bimonthly meetings that are shorter, assign three chapters to come up with something for the next meeting
[19:54] Wemewaw27: you'll get at least one item probably plus exec stuff
[19:54] rick12500: Well, maybe you could have one or two chapters come to the meeting and present (per se) what they are doing currently as a chapter.
[19:54] Wemewaw27: the more they talk and work, the more serious it will be to them
[19:55] VonBraunGuy: that might be a good idea, rick, help get the creative juices flowing between the chapters
[19:55] rick12500: If they describe what they do as a chapter, that will give others ideas and make better chapters all around.
[19:55] rmmlg08: or better yet a problem they are having with their chapter
[19:55] rmmlg08: to force conversation (rather than just a report)
[19:55] VonBraunGuy: yeah
[19:55] Wemewaw27: how do we get them to work together on a national level?
[19:55] rick12500: That's basically what we did on a computer-money committee I'm on at school for the year last year because we don't have tons to do.
[19:55] VonBraunGuy: more of an exchange of ideas with the chapters
[19:56] rick12500: That's what it should be.
[19:56] rick12500: Rather than them discussing issues handed down from on high.
[19:56] VonBraunGuy: the question then is how do we encourage them to do this?
[19:56] Wemewaw27: I'd like to see it as not so individual chapters, but working with each other, not just problem solving but collaborative efforts
[19:56] VonBraunGuy: should we provide some incentive for collaborative efforts?
[19:56] shinigaminote: yeah forcing them to talk would probably make chapters get more involved as well
[19:57] Wemewaw27: I was told by the UA rep that he just logs in and then does homework, I agree, make them talk
[19:57] rick12500: And maybe encouraging other people from their respective chapters to come observe if they like.
[19:57] rmmlg08: so assinging a couple of chapters to come up with somehting for the next meeting?
[19:57] VonBraunGuy: perhaps i could select a chapter or two each meeting and have them present what they're doing in SEDS and their vision of what SEDS should be doing
[19:57] Wemewaw27: Yes, but not just updates
[19:57] Wemewaw27: I'd have more than just one or two, and assign it the meeting before with a reminder a day before
[19:57] rick12500: Well, I mean we can generally ask them what they want to discuss at the next meeting.
[19:58] VonBraunGuy: that too
[19:58] VonBraunGuy: we should definitely encourage this kind of brainstorming at ISDC
[19:58] Wemewaw27: I was told by a few reps that if they had something worth while to do, they would be more involved
[19:58] rick12500: What to do is the question though, Keri.
[19:58] Wemewaw27: Why don't we all brainstorm on important issues and what SEDS is and should be as an organization, and ask them to do the same at ISDC
[19:59] VonBraunGuy: i like the extended updating idea
[19:59] VonBraunGuy: and that idea as well
[19:59] Wemewaw27: I'd like to see at least one collaborative project happen, if not for anything else, just to get them working together as a start
[20:00] Wemewaw27: If you guys like that idea could we also agree to think on some ideas for what that might be? At least a general idea?
[20:00] rick12500: Just make sure we realize how difficult collaborative projects across thousands of miles are.
[20:00] Wemewaw27: I know
[20:00] Wemewaw27: that's the point
[20:00] rmmlg08: well, taht's why we're trying to do it on a regional basis two
[20:00] rmmlg08: we sowed the seeds for a couple which we'll hopefully get rolling next year
[20:00] rick12500: Yeah, we could look at that certainly.
[20:00] VonBraunGuy: we could launch a collaborative outreach project
[20:00] aggieastronaut: oh, this seems like a good point to bring up that maybe they can help with the joint IYA/SEDS model project thing
[20:00] VonBraunGuy: encourage chapters to develop a common message and spread it locally
[20:00] Wemewaw27: yep, this doesn't have to be huge, but there needs to be a start because this needs to change
[20:01] VonBraunGuy: something along those lines
[20:01] rick12500: What kind of collaborative projects are you thinking of Keri?
[20:01] VonBraunGuy: IYA is a good chance to do at least some kind of collaborative blogging for outreach
[20:02] rick12500: yup
[20:02] Wemewaw27: I'm rapidly brainstorming a few things as I type. If we are thinking of outreach we can write a short program to be presented or use UCB's existing one
[20:02] Wemewaw27: We can just have a series of projects that can be done
[20:02] Wemewaw27: I'd like to connect younger students
[20:02] aggieastronaut: could we have a few students from each chapter who are actively involved in a space project/job/internship/etc. blog about their experience?
[20:02] Wemewaw27: We could help them set up a nationwide network through us, in a sort of mentoring program
[20:03] rick12500: Oh yeah if any groups are interested, I would love to have some people put together a kick ass presentation about how jobs dealing with space/spacecraft are not just for Aero Engineers.
[20:03] VonBraunGuy: have the students reach out to local high schools and the like?
[20:03] aggieastronaut: kind of like what I did for Discovery Space before the blog died: http://blogs.discovery.com/next_generation/2008/07/a-texas-semeste.html
[20:03] Wemewaw27: high school and younger
[20:03] Wemewaw27: middle and elementary too
[20:03] VonBraunGuy: makes sense
[20:04] rick12500: Yeah, and you can use our new big huge wordpress installation on seds.org if they like.
[20:04] VonBraunGuy: that might be a good start
[20:04] rick12500: basically they can have seds.org/anything be a blog.
[20:04] Wemewaw27: Ok, why don't we write up short descriptions of these possible projects
[20:04] VonBraunGuy: organize local blogs under the national SEDS umbrella
[20:04] Wemewaw27: it'll make it easier for the next CoC meeting
[20:05] rick12500: Maybe not local blogs but themed would be more interesting possibly.
[20:05] VonBraunGuy: i can write a few sentences on these possibilities and sned them out on the listserv to encourage brainstorming before the ISDC CoC
[20:05] rick12500: While locales like Texas have a lot going on in the space world, the midwest = not so much.
[20:05] rick12500: Good plan!
[20:06] rmmlg08: ok, so any other ideas on this point?
[20:06] Wemewaw27: Grant, could we have them email you their ideas back and distribute them before? Let's get this started up quickly
[20:06] VonBraunGuy: i think we've got some good starting points and there will be a lot of creativity at ISDC
[20:06] Wemewaw27: O, what are we doing about the meeting frequency?
[20:06] rick12500: You should do what Keri says, Grant.
[20:06] VonBraunGuy: i'm thinking we'll keep the frequencies at monthly?
[20:07] rmmlg08: yeah, sounded like that was the consensus; objections?
[20:07] VonBraunGuy: i'll encourage the chapters to write back and will send an email out again on whatever responses i get
[20:07] rick12500: You consider bi-monthly if chapters still have objections.
[20:07] VonBraunGuy: probably on tuesday or wednesday
[20:07] Wemewaw27: I'd like it more frequent
[20:07] VonBraunGuy: we can bring it up at ISDC
[20:07] VonBraunGuy: have the chapters brainstorm this as well
[20:07] Wemewaw27: If you are giving them more to do, nothing is going to get done if they only talk about it once a month
[20:08] Wemewaw27: if they want to keep it monthly, can we at least try to get them talking to each other about this stuff informally more in between meetings?
[20:08] rick12500: On the other hand, if you did projects by region, they wouldn't want to talk about them at CoC anyways.
[20:08] rick12500: Except for generally.
[20:08] Wemewaw27: why not region meetings then Rick?
[20:08] rick12500: Well, that's what I'm saying.
[20:09] Wemewaw27: lol, opps
[20:09] rick12500: If theoretically they wanted to meet regionally a lot and meet nationally not so much, I would say that's not horrible.
[20:09] Wemewaw27: ya, good point
[20:09] VonBraunGuy: i'll include thoughts on this in the email i send out
[20:09] Wemewaw27: is there a way to encourage IM convos more?
[20:09] Wemewaw27: in between each other in free time?
[20:10] VonBraunGuy: if we task them with things to do i think that will naturally occur if needed
[20:10] rick12500: I guess Seds needs an IRC channel or something. lol
[20:10] Wemewaw27: lol, might help Rick
[20:11] rmmlg08: ok, anything else?
[20:11] rmmlg08: or at this point, any other items for the agenda?
[20:12] rick12500: Yeah, one quick thing Ryan. Can you make sure and change the time on the google calendar entry for the next series of meetings?
[20:12] rmmlg08: sure
[20:13] rmmlg08: ok, if nothing else, then that's it
[20:13] rmmlg08: for those of you guys who will be at isdc, see you then
[20:13] shinigaminote: see you there
[20:13] VonBraunGuy: see you there!
[20:13] VonBraunGuy: ttyl
[20:14] aggieastronaut: have fun ya'll
[20:14] rick12500: Won't be there, but good luck from me.
[20:14] Wemewaw27: have fun you guys!
[20:14] rick12500: HOLD ON!!
[20:15] rick12500: I just thought of something.
[20:15] rick12500: Is there any possibility of electing a new secretary for SEDS-USA in the near future?
[20:15] Wemewaw27: has left the chat
[20:15] rick12500: ISDC or shortly thereafter?
[20:16] Wemewaw27: has joined the chat
[20:16] rmmlg08: well, let's try to get one at isdc
[20:16] rmmlg08: ie convince someone
[20:16] VonBraunGuy: lol
[20:16] VonBraunGuy: we'll have to impeach our current secretary i suppose
[20:16] shinigaminote: sounds like a plan
[20:16] rick12500: What do we do to impeach the Sec?
[20:17] VonBraunGuy: i'm not sure exactly
[20:17] VonBraunGuy: but i can take a look at the constitution
[20:17] rick12500: Would CoC have to do it or us?
[20:18] Wemewaw27: definitly talk to Josh about this Rick
[20:18] VonBraunGuy: yeah, he'd know best
[20:18] rick12500: Ok.
[20:19] rick12500: I'll set a goal of getting it done in the next month, so just a head's up.
[20:20] VonBraunGuy: here's the official word on impeachment, btw:
[20:22] VonBraunGuy: nvm
[20:22] VonBraunGuy: too long to post here
[20:23] Wemewaw27: can you email it to us all?
[20:23] VonBraunGuy: hold on
[20:23] rick12500: Impeachment proceedings against any Board member may begin if, upon the written request to the Chairman or Vice-Chairman by another Board member or three Chapter Representatives, the Chairman or Vice-Chairman conducts a confidence vote of the Executive Board, and a majority of the Board believes the Board member should be removed from office. If this occurs, the Board member in question will be suspended from all duties for the duration of the impeachment proceedings. This confidence vote must be completed within one week of the written request.
[20:23] seds: Unable to send message: The message is too large.
[20:23] VonBraunGuy: AIM's getting weird
[20:23] rick12500: If a majority of the Board deems an investigation necessary, the Chair or Vice-Chair shall conduct a two-week investigation of the charges against the Board member.
[20:23] rick12500: Within one week of the closing of the confidence vote, or at the close of the investigation, the Chairman or Vice-Chairman shall initiate a vote of the Council of Chapters. If a simple two-thirds vote of the Council of Chapters determines that the Board member in question should be removed from office then the Board member is officially removed from office. Otherwise, (s)he shall retain his/her office and impeachment proceedings shall be considered concluded.
[20:23] seds: Unable to send message: The message is too large.
[20:23] VonBraunGuy: seds.org slash policy slash constitution.php#ARTICLE II
[20:24] VonBraunGuy: fianlly something AIM didn't ban
[20:24] rick12500: Yeah, so it looks like we'd have to hold off, do an "investigation" and then impeach via the next CoC meeting.
[20:25] rick12500: Technically by the constitution we should all be submitting updates like we may have a while back.
[20:26] rick12500: I'll probably start doing it again over the summer, anyone with me?
[20:26] Wemewaw27: ya, I don't submit an update unless I've accomplished something cool
[20:26] shinigaminote: yeah I have neglected that as well
[20:26] Wemewaw27: but I'll start again every week like I was
[20:26] VonBraunGuy: that might be something we should ammend
[20:26] VonBraunGuy: or we could all start doing it again
[20:27] shinigaminote: let's try to do that
[20:27] Wemewaw27: do it again, it was a great idea, we all just got a little lazy lol
[20:27] rick12500: I'd be up for doing it. Not too hard, but we should have a due date each week. Ryan?
[20:27] shinigaminote:
[20:28] rick12500: I'd say like noon on Sunday.
[20:28] rick12500: That gives us time if we forget to slide it in.
[20:28] bsntmath: has joined the chat
[20:28] Wemewaw27: can we just do noon at our own times, no annoying conversions?
[20:28] shinigaminote: noon sounds good
[20:28] rick12500: Yeah, it'd probably be more a personal thing anyways.
[20:29] rick12500: Would probably help Joshua though.
[20:29] rick12500: Ok cool. I'll work on the official process for impeachment tomorrow.
[20:29] Wemewaw27: we can try to submit agenda items at the same time
[20:29] bsntmath: who's being impeached?
[20:29] rick12500: Yeah, that would probably be the idea.
[20:30] Wemewaw27: well, as just something to point out on impeachment
[20:30] shinigaminote: secretary is in question
[20:30] Wemewaw27: did anyone read how the position will be filled again?
[20:30] Wemewaw27: it makes me the slight bit nervous
[20:30] Wemewaw27: When a seat on the Executive Board is vacant, the Director of Chapter Affairs must inform all chapters of this vacancy. Qualified candidates must declare their intention to run, in writing, to the Director of Chapter Affairs.
[20:31] Wemewaw27: Ballots shall be distributed two weeks after there is at least one qualified person who declares his candidacy for the vacant seat.
[20:31] Wemewaw27: All returned ballots shall be counted three weeks after the Director of Chapter Affairs has sent them out.
[20:31] rick12500: So I'll have Joshua talk to Zeke and we'll see what happens from there.
[20:31] VonBraunGuy: yeah
[20:31] VonBraunGuy: since it looks like it won't be ready in time for ISDC
[20:32] rick12500: Yeah, I talked to Darrell and he talked about rushing it, but it's not super necessary.
[20:32] rick12500: I have tons of time to post transcripts and such now.
[20:32] rick12500: (and no work tomorrow Woot!)
[20:33] rmmlg08: rick, so you have the xscript?
[20:33] Wemewaw27: Ya, lets not rush into anything mean or enemy making. We'll give Zeke a chance.
[20:34] rick12500: Yeah, Ryan I can get the transcript.
[20:35] Wemewaw27: this time are we actually done?
[20:35] rick12500: Yeah sorry about that.
[20:35] Wemewaw27: no, not a problem, my stomach is growling though
[20:36] rick12500: You people and your crazy time zones!
[20:37] VonBraunGuy: fooding time indeed
[20:37] VonBraunGuy: au revoir, mes ami(e)s
[20:37] VonBraunGuy: has left the chat
| 2008-2009 SEDS-USA Meetings |
| Exec Board Minutes: 11/24 | 12/01 | 12/08 | 12/22 | 1/5 | 1/12 | 1/19 | 1/26 | 2/2 | 2/9 | 2/16 | 2/23 | 3/2 | 3/9 | 3/16 | 3/23 | 4/6 | 4/13 | 4/20 | 4/27 | 5/4 | 5/11 | 5/18 | 5/25 | 6/1 | 6/8 | 6/15 | 6/22 | 6/29 | 7/6 | 7/13 | 7/20 | 7/27 | 8/3 | 8/10 | 8/17 | 8/24 | 8/31 | 9/7 | 9/14 | 9/21 | 9/28 | 10/5 | 10/6* | 10/12 | 10/20 | 10/26 | 11/2 | 11/9 | 11/16 |
| Exec Board Transcripts: 11/24 | 12/01 | 12/08 | 12/22 | 1/5 | 1/12 | 1/19 | 1/26 | 2/2 | 2/9 | 2/16 | 2/23 | 3/2 | 3/9 | 3/16 | 3/23 | 4/6 | 4/13 | 4/20 | 4/27 | 5/4 | 5/11 | 5/18 | 5/25 | 6/1 | 6/8 | 6/15 | 6/22 | 6/29 | 7/6 | 7/13 | 7/20 | 7/27 | 8/3 | 8/10 | 8/17 | 8/24 | 8/31 | 9/7 | 9/14 | 9/21 | 9/28 | 10/5 | 10/6* | 10/12 | 10/20 | 10/26 | 11/2 | 11/9 | 11/16 |
| Council of Chapters Transcripts: 12/3 | 12/15 | 1/28 | 2/25 | 3/25 | 4/29 | 5/30 | 6/24 | 7/29 | 8/25 | 9/30 | 10/28 | 11/15 |
