SEDSAT-2 ADCS New beginning, nov 2007

From SEDSWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

SEDSAT-2 Main Page


SEDSAT-2 ADCS

Contents

Passive Systems

Passive Magnetic

-Permanent Magnet and hysterisis rods

Gravity gradient boom

-Gravity gradient boom (this is a partial control system, and needs a determination system)


Provides gravity gradient stabilization on small spacecraft


- Accurate to within ±5 deg of nadir

- Used for “short” deployments (< 6m)

- High stiffness compared to tethers

- Bigger and heavier than a tether


There are 5 main boom types to consider:

- STEM Boom

- Elastic Memory Composite (EMC) Boom

- STACER Boom (SSTL)

- Coilable Booms

- Inflatable Boom

questions:

The accuracy seems to me quite high, do you happen to know about the timeframe such accuracy will be achieved? looks like there has a lot of time to pass to achieve that.....?

About the initial orientation, how do you get the boom to start prezising in the right direction? (towars or away from nadir)

Active Systems

Reaction Wheels

Momentum Wheels

Active Magnetic System

Determination: Magnetometers

Control: Magnetic Coils

Detailed documentation: http://www.cubesat.auc.dk/, http://www.ncube.no/

SWOT Analysis

Strenghts Weaknesses
> Often used by other CubeSats (well tested)
> cheap
> no moving parts
> interaction with magnetometers
> not innovative
> not free
Opportunities Threats
> None > None


Micro propulsion system

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulsed_plasma_thruster for general information

Design Goals for µPPT by ARC Seibersdorf (we would get fly-ready prototypes for SEDSat):

- Impulse bit: 10-20µNs, which would guarantee a pointing accuracy of <1 degree
- Spec. impulse: 500-1000 s
- Power: 0,5-1,5 W
- Weight: < 30g

SWOT Analysis

Strenghts Weaknesses
> Innovative (I think the first use with CubSat)
> Very Accurate (<1°)
> Electr. Prop: Can almost never run out of propellant
> non-toxic propellant (Teflon)
> professional manufactured devices
> free
> High electr. Power Consumption (maybe up to 1,5 W per Thruster)
> relatively heavy (<30g) -> only 6 thruster configuration to use
Opportunities Threats
> Could also be used for Orbit Changes (in limits), with additional thruster(s)
> PR for using an innovative new technology for CubeSat
> Not available before Fall 2008
> New Technology (first ones to test)

Attitude determination systems

magnetometers

accelerometers

Gyroscopes

Sun sensors

Horizon sensors

Dalsa Sensors

Documentation: File:OM6802WCW5R2 071204.pdf

SWOT Analysis

Strenghts Weaknesses
> Innovative (I think the first use with CubSat)
> Accurate
> professional manufactured devices
> free
> light weight, small volume
> Possibly High electr. Power Consumption depending on use
> Have not determined precisely how they would be used
> Complicated
Opportunities Threats
> PR for using an innovative new technology for CubeSat > New Technology (first ones to test in space)
>need to test them to determine how we will use them
> need to negotiate in order to
obtain them without committing to using them.
company representative currently out of office



star trackers

discarded systems

all the system we have decided not to use

Personal tools